Booker v. McMindes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a vagueness challenge was \particularly\ weak \since whatever debate there is would center around the appropriate sentence and not the criminality of the conduct\
• concluding that a vagueness challenge was “particularly” weak “since whatever debate there is would center around the appropriate sentence and not the criminality of the conduct”
• holding that a vagueness claim must be evaluated as \applied to the facts of [the] case\ when \First Amendment freedoms are not infringed\
• holding that a vagueness claim must be evaluated as “applied to the facts of [the] case” when “First Amendment freedoms are not infringed”
• holding that the weight of the blotter paper containing LSD, and not the weight of the pure LSD, determines eligibility for the minimum sentence
• holding that the term \mixture or substance\ in 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841(b)(1) includes the carrier medium in which LSD is absorbed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).