· 3/29/1991
Bonz v. Sudweeks
Citations
- 808 P.2d 876
- 119 Idaho 539
- 1991 Ida. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting statute requiring that suit be filed within two years of “the occurrence, act or omission complained of”; despite this language, limitations does not begin to run until plaintiff sustains “some damage”
- action for malpractice accrued when plaintiffs learned of cloud on title due to attorney’s improper recording and investor refused to participate in sale
- action for malpractice accrued when plaintiffs learned of cloud on title due to attorney's improper recording and investor refused to participate in sale
- determination of what constitutes “damage” must be decided on circumstances presented in individual case
- determination of what constitutes \damage\ must be decided on circumstances presented in individual case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyle, Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, McDevitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.