Skip to main content
· 3/29/1991

Bonz v. Sudweeks

Citations

  • 808 P.2d 876
  • 119 Idaho 539
  • 1991 Ida. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting statute requiring that suit be filed within two years of “the occurrence, act or omission complained of”; despite this language, limitations does not begin to run until plaintiff sustains “some damage”
  • action for malpractice accrued when plaintiffs learned of cloud on title due to attorney’s improper recording and investor refused to participate in sale
  • action for malpractice accrued when plaintiffs learned of cloud on title due to attorney's improper recording and investor refused to participate in sale
  • determination of what constitutes “damage” must be decided on circumstances presented in individual case
  • determination of what constitutes \damage\ must be decided on circumstances presented in individual case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle, Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, McDevitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.