Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand would be futile for the lack of a function-by-function analysis of irrelevant or uncontested functions
• holding that remand was proper because the ALJ failed to adequately explain how he arrived at plaintiff’s RFC
• holding that remand would be futile for the lack of a function-by-function analysis of irrelevant or uncontested functions
• holding that “an ALJ does not account ‘for a claimant’s limitations in concentration, persistence, and pace by restricting the hypothetical question to simple, routine tasks or unskilled work’”
• holding that “an ALJ does not account for a claimant’s limitations in concentration, persistence, and pace by restricting the hypothetical question to simple, routine tasks or unskilled work.”
• holding that an ALJ may not account for a claimant’s moderate CPP limitations by restricting the RFC to simple, routine tasks or unskilled work without explaining why such provisions adequately address the claimant’s CPP limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).