Bonniecrest Condo. Assn. v. Cummins, 00-187 (2001)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a special master did not abuse her discretion in reducing one law firm’s fees by 20 percent and another law firm’s fees by 40 percent
• explaining that, while it is reasonable for an experienced practitioner to also utilize an associate, specific billing entries may still be unreasonable where multiple attorneys bill for the same task or where two attorneys bill for the same intraoffice communication
• approving the chief special master’s reduction of one firm’s fees by twenty percent and a second firm’s fees by forty percent
• stating the special master did not abuse her discretion when reducing fees for admission to the United States Court of Federal Claims Bar
• stating the special master did not abuse her discretion when reducing fees for admission to the United States Court of Federal Claims Bar
• approving the chief special master's reduction of one firm's fees by twenty percent and a second firm's fees by forty percent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).