Skip to main content
· 9/28/2006

Bonnie Wittenburg v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., American Association of Retired Persons, Amicus on Behalf Of

Citations

  • 464 F.3d 831
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24368
  • 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,596
  • 98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1697
  • 2006 WL 2771679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a comparator six years younger than the plaintiff is insignificantly younger
  • evaluating comments by plaintiffs co-workers, but ultimately finding no causal connection between comments and adverse employment action
  • assuming without deciding that plaintiff in ADEA case met prima facie case
  • assuming without deciding that plaintiff in ADEA case met prima facie case
  • “[T]he presence of subjectivity in employee evaluations is itself not a grounds for challenging those evaluations as discriminatory.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[Arguments of counsel are not evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Hansen, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.