Bonnie Hargis v. Access Capital Funding, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court’s jurisdiction is measured at the time of removal, even though subsequent events may remove from the case the facts on which jurisdiction was predicated
• holding that the court's jurisdiction is measured at the time of removal, even though subsequent events may remove from the case the facts on which jurisdiction was predicated
• finding no abuse of discretion where district court denied request for judicial notice of legislative materials, policy statements, and a preamble to a proposed rule
• affirming denial of Rule 56(d) motion where district court stayed discovery and then ruled on motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff failed to show what further facts he would uncover through a Rule 56(d) extension
• a plaintiff who did not pay a fee for unauthorized legal services did not have standing to bring an unauthorized-practice-of-law claim
• “Under the preponderance standard, the jurisdictional fact ... is not whether the damages are greater than the requisite amount, but whether a fact finder might legally conclude that they are...[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).