Skip to main content
· 8/10/2004

Bonnie Harbuck v. United States

Citations

  • 378 F.3d 1324
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16452
  • 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 303
  • 2004 WL 1774993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the two legal theories presented by an EPA and Title VII claim were merely \different manifestations of the same underlying claim that the Air Force discriminated against women by paying them less than men\
  • “The inclusion of other and different requested relief in the two complaints [beyond the money damages requested in both complaints] does not avoid the application of [section 1500].”
  • “Thus, under § 1631, [the plaintiffs transferred] claim was deemed filed in the Court of Federal Claims on the same day on which she originally filed that claim as one of the three counts of her district court complaint.”
  • “Both claims also ‘seek the same relief: money damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Friedman, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.