Bonnetts v. Arctic Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relationship between parties “was not one of a permanent nature, and therefore, indicative of an independent.contractor relationship.”
• if defendant exerted significant control over plaintiffs route selection and other aspects of his job, plaintiff did not use his skills in an independent manner consistent with status as an independent contractor
• “Significant expenditures are indicative of the operation of an independent business enterprise.”
• applying “economic realities” test in FMLA dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).