· 1/9/2009
Bonner v. Outlaw
Citations
- 552 F.3d 673
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 202
- 2009 WL 48223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “a reasonable official would understand that failing to give [an inmate] notice his packages were rejected violates a constitutional right”
- finding that due process right to notice of prison’s rejection of legal mail was clearly established by Procunier
- dismissing argument that actual notice was adequate when plaintiff claimed he suffered harm from not receiving timely notice
- dismissing argument that actual notice was adequate when plaintiff claimed he suffered harm from not receiving timely notice
- finding Procunier clearly established an inmate’s due process right to notice whenever correspondence addressed to him is rejected
- dismissing argument that actual notice was adequate when plaintiff claimed he suffered harm from not receiving timely notice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bye, Gibson, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.