Skip to main content
· 1/9/2009

Bonner v. Outlaw

Citations

  • 552 F.3d 673
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 202
  • 2009 WL 48223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “a reasonable official would understand that failing to give [an inmate] notice his packages were rejected violates a constitutional right”
  • finding that due process right to notice of prison’s rejection of legal mail was clearly established by Procunier
  • dismissing argument that actual notice was adequate when plaintiff claimed he suffered harm from not receiving timely notice
  • dismissing argument that actual notice was adequate when plaintiff claimed he suffered harm from not receiving timely notice
  • finding Procunier clearly established an inmate’s due process right to notice whenever correspondence addressed to him is rejected
  • dismissing argument that actual notice was adequate when plaintiff claimed he suffered harm from not receiving timely notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Gibson, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.