Skip to main content
· 10/28/1884

Bonner v. Dale

Citations

  • 62 Tex. 300
  • 1884 Tex. LEXIS 233

Syllabus

<p>1. Boundary—Charge of the court.— In an action to settle boundary, a charge as to whether one of the contiguous tracts of land is separate or community property is unnecessary. Vide Higgins v. Johnson, 30 Tex., 389; Holloway v. Holloway, 30 Tex., 164.</p> <p>2. Same—Fact case.— See facts in opinion of the court where a charge under those facts was held good as to the character of a boundary line, and the acquiescence of parties to that line.</p> <p>3. Same — Measure of damages.— A charge relating to the measure of damages sustained by reason of interference with the erection of a certain wall, to the effect that the measure of damages sustained by reason of such interference is the difference in the cost of erecting the wall as commenced originally and its cost upon completion as the party was afterwards compelled to build it by reason of the interruption, was proper.</p>

Judges: Apr, Com, Delany

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.