Bonner v. Arizona Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Due Process Clause entitled deaf, mute, and vision impaired inmate to an interpreter at disciplinary hearing
• concluding that the Due Process Clause entitled deaf, mute, and vision impaired inmate to an interpreter at disciplinary hearing
• holding that deaf, mute, and vision-impaired inmate had constitutional right to a sign language interpreter where state prison had denied communication assistance in disciplinary proceedings, counseling sessions, and medical treatment
• holding that deaf, mute, and vision-impaired inmate had constitutional right to a sign language interpreter where state prison had denied communication as sistance in disciplinary proceedings, counseling sessions, and medical treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).