· 12/15/1980
Bonner County v. Panhandle Rodeo Ass'n, Inc.
Citations
- 620 P.2d 1102
- 101 Idaho 772
- 1980 Ida. LEXIS 575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- any person who has a claim under an insurance policy can recover attorney fees under § 41-1839, including additional insureds
- [T]he ambiguous circumstance in which a policy has been issued purportedly providing coverage but with exclusionary provisions which, if applied, would narrow that coverage to “defeat the very purpose or object of the insurance.”
- [T]he ambiguous circumstance in which a policy has been issued purportedly providing coverage but with exclusionary provisions which, if applied, would narrow that coverage to \defeat the very purpose or object of the insurance.\
- [T]he ambiguous circumstance in which a policy has been issued purportedly providing coverage but with exclusionary provisions which, if applied, would narrow that coverage to “defeat the very purpose or object of the insurance.”
- “The rule in Idaho is that in the absence of ambiguity, contracts for insurance must be construed as any other and understood in their plain, ordinary and proper sense, according to the meaning derived from the plain wording of the contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donaldson, Shepard, McFadden, Bistline, Bakes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.