Skip to main content
· 7/6/2010

Bonington v. Town of Westport

Citations

  • 999 A.2d 700
  • 297 Conn. 297
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding enforcement of zoning regulations constituted discretionary act
  • noting ‘‘even when the duty to respond to a violation of law is ministerial because that specific response is mandated, the predicate act—determining whether a violation of law exists—generally is deemed to be a discretionary act’’ [emphasis omitted]
  • cause of action lies against municipality for allegedly negligent performance of municipal official \[i]f by statute or other rule of law the official's duty is clearly ministerial rather than discretionary\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “even when the duty to respond to a violation of law is ministerial because that specific response is mandated, the predicate act — determining whether a violation of law exists — generally is deemed to be a discretionary act”
  • ‘‘Imminent does not simply mean a foreseeable event at some unspecified point in the not too distant future. Rather, we have required plaintiffs to identify a discrete place and time period at which the harm will occur.’’
  • “the plaintiffs claim that checking to see whether required permits and forms have been obtained and filed . . . and enforcing clear violations of zoning regulations are not discretionary acts . . . . [W]e disagree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.