Skip to main content
· 4/17/1939

Bonici v. Standard Oil Co.

Citations

  • 103 F.2d 437
  • 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 4782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “con-clusory statements, without specific evi-dentiary support, cannot support an actionable claim for harassment”
  • holding that plaintiffs conclusory statements of differential treatment of similarly situated employees, without specific evidentiary support, cannot support an actionable claim for harassment
  • holding that conclusory statements, without specific evidentiary support, are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment
  • holding that thirteen months is too long to show causation in the absence of other evidence of retaliation
  • holding that a “thirteen month interval between the charge and termination is too long to establish causation absent other evidence of retaliation”
  • holding that plaintiff had not stated a prima facie case for retaliation because plaintiff did not present any evidence that his employer was involved in the investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Hand, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.