Bong Jin Kim v. Nazarian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding improper use of nontestifying experts’ opinions was prejudicial where defense counsel “highlighted” opinions in opening and closing statements
• fact that a colleague agreed with an experts opinion is of dubious value and party unable to cross-examine the corroborative opinion will likely be prejudiced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).