Bonenberger v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insurer's claims practice manual was relevant evidence in a bad faith claim against the insurer
• holding that an insurer’s claims practice manual was relevant evidence in a bad faith claim against the insurer
• recognizing that a UIM claim has both first party and third party components
• holding that “[i]t is the responsibility of insurers to treat their insureds fairly and provide just compensation for covered claims baáed on the actual damages suffered.”
• holding that “[i]t is the responsibility of insurers to treat their insureds fairly and provide just compensation for covered claims based on the actual damages suffered.”
• holding that “the admission or exclusion of expert testimony in actions on insurance policies based on a claim of bad faith remain a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).