Bondz v. Pennsylvania Co.
Citations
- 138 Pa. 153
- 20 A. 871
- 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1250
Syllabus
<p>[To be reported.]</p> <p>1. Where no exception was taken to the refusal by the court below to take off a judgment of peremptory nonsuit entered, the testimony for the plaintiff cannot come before the Supreme Court, and the action of the court below in refusing the motion cannot be reviewed: Tasker v. Sheldon, 115 Pa. 107.*</p> <p>2. Facts arising upon the evidence can find their way into the record in but three modes: (a) By the finding of a jury, called a special verdict; (6) by the agreement of the parties, called a case stated; and (o) by the certificate of the court contained in a bill of exceptions: Miller v. Hershey, 59 Pa. 64.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- delivery of fourteen of thirty-seven loads and other driving time substantial
- same where claimant resided in Morrisville, Pennsylvania
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.