Bondurant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The plain, clear, and unambiguous language of the statutes at issue in this case allow for DNA analysis, but not additional serological testing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sean Patrick Goble v. State of Tennessee
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2018-07-12
• Willie L. Pegues v. State of Tennessee
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2019-03-19

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Henley v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 2,590×
• Momon v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2000-03-30· cited 1,008×
• Serrano v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2004-04-22· cited 122×
• Browder v. Morris
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-08-31· cited 112×
• State v. Owens
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2000-06-20· cited 80×
• In Re Conservatorship of Clayton
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-09-22· cited 79×
• Austin v. Memphis Publishing Co.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1983-08-01· cited 72×
• State v. Alford
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 52×
• Griffin v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2006-01-13· cited 36×
• Locust v. State
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-06-02· cited 30×
• Roberson v. University of Tennessee
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-08-28· cited 24×
• Wausau Insurance Co. v. Dorsett
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2005-08-19· cited 14×