Bondoc v. Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s advice was constitutionally inadequate by erroneously telling his client that he faced no risk of deportation upon pleading guilty to simple assault
• holding that plea counsel’s incorrect advice concerning a defendant’s risk of deportation constituted ineffective assistance of counsel
• holding counsel’s representation of defendant was constitutionally deficient where counsel made no assurance that the specific charge to which defendant pleaded guilty was a deportable offense
• determining counsel’s advice to be constitutionally inadequate when he informed his client that he faced no risk of deportation upon pleading guilty to simple assault
• listing the three ineffectiveness prongs, including that a petitioner must prove any alleged ineffectiveness prejudiced him by establishing that “there is a reasonable probability the outcome of the proceedings would have been different”
• “The reasonable probability test refers to a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).