Bondar v. Simmons Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recovery not precluded by fact that claimant’s reaction to work conditions is not typical
• Dupuytrens Contracture from repeated driving of heavy equipment and handling of heavy apparatus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
• Giambattista v. Thomas A. Edison
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1954-09-20· cited 30×
• Goyden v. State
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-05-20· cited 18×
• Walsh v. Kotler
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-07-30· cited 9×
• Duncan v. TI McCormack Trucking Co.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1956-02-29· cited 7×
• Walsh v. Kotler
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1956-12-10· cited 6×
• Mitchell v. Mucon Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-06-25· cited 4×
• Fiore v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-02-22· cited 4×
• Reynolds v. General Motors Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1955-11-29· cited 3×
• Gibson v. Todd Shipyard Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-06-01· cited 2×
• Abelit v. General Motors Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-10-04· cited 1×