Bonar v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when trial court has considered all relevant factors in its forum non conveniens analysis, ‘The court’s ruling deserves substantial deference,” and appellate court should not conduct de novo review “by reweighing each of the factors” (quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he trial court may consider any Xia does not assert on appeal that the forum-selection clause is invalid based 4 on fraud. 10 evidence properly before it, including evidence attached to the defendant’s forum non conveniens motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).