Bonanno v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs did not have standing because the dog food they purchased was not tainted
• no injury in fact where plaintiff only alleged that dog food was at risk of contamination without alleging that purchased dog food was contaminated
• “In a case based on federal diversity jurisdiction, the law of the forum state governs.”
• “In a case based on federal diversity jurisdiction, the law of the forum state governs.”
• “The only conclusion that a reasonable consumer could draw from 6 a package that claimed the dog food was ‘Biologically Appropriate’ is that it was fit for 7 dogs to consume.”
• “We agree with the district court that Plaintiffs’ claims fail to allege materially false or misleading statements on Champion’s packaging because the phrases fail to deceive or mislead reasonable consumers on any material fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).