Skip to main content
· 8/21/1986

Bonan v. City of Boston

Citations

  • 496 N.E.2d 640
  • 398 Mass. 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating on procedural grounds lower court holding that linkage fees closely resemble a tax, requiring express statutory authorization
  • standing requires “a definite interest in the matters in contention in the sense that [a plaintiff’s] rights will be significantly affected by [the] resolution of the contested point”
  • standing requires “a definite interest in the matters in contention in the sense that [a plaintiff’s] rights will be significantly affected by a resolution of the contested point”
  • standing requires ‘a definite interest in the matters in contention in the sense that [a plaintiff’s] rights will be significantly affected by a resolution of the contested point’
  • defendants should not have been foreclosed from asserting affirmative defenses by entry of final judgment after denial of motion to dismiss
  • plaintiff had no standing to seek declaratory relief where a ruling would have no impact on its rights or obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Liacos, Abrams, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.