U.S. Tax Court· 5/14/1981
Bonaire Development Co. v. Commissioner
Citations
- 76 T.C. 789
- 1981 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no business purpose for prepayment of management fees
- no business purpose for prepayment of management fees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- RLC Indus. Co. v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1992-04-22· cited 42×
- Stephen A. Keller and Ethel L. Keller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueEighth Circuit· 1984-02-01· cited 33×
- Bonaire Development Company, a California Corporation, Successor by Merger to Branjon, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1982-06-08· cited 27×
- Sebring v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1989-08-08· cited 10×
- Holiday Village Shopping Center ex rel. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1984-06-06· cited 3×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 9,823×
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 3,633×
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court· 1948-04-19· cited 2,464×
- Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueTenth Circuit· 1971-06-18· cited 1,604×
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1944-01-03· cited 676×
- Johnny Weimerskirch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1979-05-02· cited 493×
- Weimerskirch v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1977-01-17· cited 399×
- Putoma Corp. v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1976-06-30· cited 97×
- Putoma Corp., Successor by Merger of Pro-Mac Company, Petitioners- Cross-Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1979-08-27· cited 95×
- Alice Phelan Sullivan Corporation, a California Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1967-07-20· cited 73×
- West Seattle National Bank of Seattle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1961-02-27· cited 67×
- Union Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 1940-02-27· cited 64×
- Louis Spitalny and Betty Spitalny, His Wife v. United States of America, William Erdwurm and Bart F. Erdwurm, His Wife v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1970-07-29· cited 60×
- West Seattle Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1959-11-27· cited 49×
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Lake Farms, Inc., Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Lake FarmsNinth Circuit· 1963-11-22· cited 41×
- Hill v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1974-11-19· cited 41×
- Frank E. Connery, in No. 19,432 v. United States of America. Max Kraven, in No. 19,433 v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 39×
- Martin J. And Margaret M. Zaninovich and Vincent M. And Dorothy F. Zaninovich v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1980-04-03· cited 39×
- Zaninovich v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1978-01-25· cited 34×
- Arthur G. B. Metcalf v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFirst Circuit· 1965-03-30· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.