Bomba v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CAS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insureds’ negligence in storing their firearms was the appropriate focus in calculating number of occurrences, not the gunman’s intervening acts
• “‘[F]or the purpose of counting the number of occurrences, the term must be construed from the point of view of the cause or causes of the accident rather than its effect.’” (quoting Doria v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 509 A.D. 220, 223 (N.J. App. Div. 1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).