Skip to main content
· 3/18/1987

Boman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 505 So. 2d 445
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 354
  • 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence insufficient to establish as matter of law that notice was mailed in absence of evidence by any witness having personal knowledge that notice was prepared
  • released the same day as Hepler and reaching the same conclusion in construing this statutory provision
  • “[S]ince the record does not support the conclusion, as a matter of law, that State Farm did so, the cited cases are distinguishable ... and the summary judgment for State Farm cannot be affirmed on this ground.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zehmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.