Skip to main content
· 8/23/2002

Bolz v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 52 P.3d 898
  • 274 Kan. 420
  • 2002 Kan. LEXIS 546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting majority rule and rejecting insurer’s position “that the public policy in favor of freedom of contract is superior to the public policy in favor of free assignment of choses of action”
  • adopting majority rule and rejecting insurer's position \that the public policy in favor of freedom of contract is superior to the public policy in favor of free assignment of choses of action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Six, Davis, Brazil, McFarland, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.