Bolz v. Bolz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “allocation or apportionment of each [defendant’s] negligence or fault must be assessed, even if there is a possibility that [one defendant] may not be liable for damages.” (emphasis added)
• concluding the verdict sheet's failure to require a discrete mandatory finding on an issue required reversal and a new trial
• assessing a verdict sheet as part of the jury instructions and concluding that the sheet’s failure to require a discrete mandatory finding on an issue required reversal and a new trial
• explaining verdict sheets are considered part of the jury charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).