Skip to main content
· 10/14/1946

Bollinger v. Gotham Garage Co.

Citations

  • 329 U.S. 733
  • 67 S. Ct. 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although insurance policy provided that mysterious disappearance of property would presumed to be due to theft, circumstantial evidence supported trial court’s inference that property at issue was lost rather than stolen
  • although insurance policy provided that mysterious disappearance of property would presumed to be due to theft, circumstantial evidence supported trial court’s inference that property at issue was lost rather than stolen
  • although insurance policy provided that mysterious disappearance of property would presumed to be due to theft, circumstantial evidence supported trial court‘s inference that property at issue was lost rather than stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.