Bolling v. Bolling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The intent to award alimony in gross should be necessarily inferred from the language used or should be unequivocally expressed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lacey v. Lacey
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2013-02-15· cited 6×
• Andrews v. Andrews
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2017-12-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hager v. Hager
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1974-08-08· cited 147×
• Spalding v. Spalding
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1980-02-29· cited 29×
• Trammell v. Trammell
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1988-01-13· cited 19×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1985-06-12· cited 9×