Skip to main content
· 10/15/1834

Bolivar Manufacturing Co. v. Neponset Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 33 Mass. 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that issue of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived and can be raised at any time
  • explaining that “if Oregon is not a child’s home state, [an Oregon court] nevertheless may have jurisdiction under ORS 109.741(1)(b) to (d), which confer jurisdiction on a state that is not a home state in three circumstances”
  • noting our request for supplemental briefing on a legal issue of first impression, specifically regarding the tests used in other jurisdictions
  • Oregon law “is unequivocal that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be con- ferred by consent, waiver, or estoppel and may be raised at any time”
  • “We review for legal error the trial court’s deter- mination that it had subject matter jurisdiction under the UCCJEA.”
  • “Oregon law with respect to subject matter jurisdiction generally, and with respect to the UCCJEA specifically, is unequivocal that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be con- ferred by consent, waiver, or estoppel and may be raised at any time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.