Skip to main content
· 11/24/2010

Bolinger v. Neal

Citations

  • 259 P.3d 1259
  • 2010 WL 4054510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that an easement was not created because under a common development plan, “the dominant estate need not be specifically described”
  • “[W]here ‘a developer sells lots according to a recorded plat, the grantees acquire an easement in any areas set apart for their use.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webb, Miller, Booras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.