Skip to main content
· 12/30/1976

Boling v. National Zinc Co.

Citations

  • 435 F. Supp. 18
  • 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus, under the express language of the DPPA the term 21 ‘knowingly’ only modifies the phrase ‘obtains, discloses, or uses personal information.’”
  • “Under Rule 401 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 20 information having ‘any tendency’ to make a fact in dispute ‘more or less probable’ is 21 relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.