Boling v. N. & W. Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding government did not constructively amend indictment when specific conduct government proved at trial adequately described by general language in indictment
• finding that the trial court’s explanation to the jury for their anonymity was both “plausible and nonprejudicial”
• noting that the explanation given to the jurors for their anonymity was both “plausible and nonprejudicial”
• affirming the district court’s instruction, which stated, in part, that the juror anonymity was not because of an apprehension of danger
• the defendant conspired with individuals with the capacity and willingness to interfere with the judicial process
• court considered evidence in camera; ex parte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).