Bolin v. T & T MINING

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a reopening under KRS 342.125(5)(a) because there was no evidence that the claimant had further exposure to coal dust post-award
• denying a reopening under KRS 342.125(5)(a) because there was no evidence that the claimant had further exposure to coal dust post-award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).