Bolin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• injuries resulting from shooting not excluded under the subjective standard because it is not sufficient that the insured should have anticipated the harm
• an inference of intent to injure did not arise as a matter of law from insured's act of shooting a pellet gun at the rear of the injured party's truck, and therefore, the insured's subjective intent controlled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).