Skip to main content

Bolin v. State

Citations

  • 736 So. 2d 1160
  • 1999 WL 394284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exposure to prejudicial information “might not require disqualification of prospective jurors if this information were going to be introduced into evidence”
  • individual voir dire should have been allowed in retrial where multiple articles published within a few days of jury selection recounted inadmissible information from the defendant’s first trial for the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.