Skip to main content

Bolin v. State

Citations

  • 642 So. 2d 540
  • 1994 WL 137860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding erroneous admission of privileged testimony harmful where statements from Bolin to his wife were integral part of State’s case and reviewing court could not determine whether they played significant role in jury’s determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.