Skip to main content
· 2/2/1966

Bolick v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Citations

  • 249 F. Supp. 735
  • 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This single line in Mazza, unexplained and absent any discussion of prior Ninth Circuit precedent, directly contradicts Bates, which was rendered en banc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hemphill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.