· 2/2/1966
Bolick v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Citations
- 249 F. Supp. 735
- 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6682
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This single line in Mazza, unexplained and absent any discussion of prior Ninth Circuit precedent, directly contradicts Bates, which was rendered en banc.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hemphill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.