Boley v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that agency's statutory interpretation is inapplicable where such interpretation \`is unduly restricted and in conflict with the legislative intent'\
• recognizing that agency’s statutory interpretation is inapplicable where such interpretation “ ‘is unduly restricted and in conflict with the legislative intent’ ”
• recognizing that administrative interpretations of statutes are given great weight unless unduly restrictive and in conflict with legislative intent
• ‘ “Statutes which relate to the same subject matter should be read and applied together so that the Legislature’s intention can be gathered from the whole of the enactments.” Syllabus Point 3, Smith v. State Workmen’s Compensation Comm’r, 159 W.Va. 108, 219 S.E.2d 361 (1975
• “ ‘Statutes which relate to the same subject matter should be read and applied together so that the Legislature’s intention can be gathered from the whole of the enactments.’ Syllabus Point 3, Smith v. State Workmen’s Compensation Comm’r, 159 W.Va. 108, 219 S.E.2d 361 (1975).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).