Supreme Court of Alabama· 9/22/1989
Boles v. Autery
Citations
- 554 So. 2d 959
- 1989 WL 122409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \That a witness is present in court and testifies in the proceedings does not necessarily mean that the witness should not be joined as a party.\
- “[I]f the county and other persons are not bound, then the status of the road as public or private is subject to being litigated again, and the results, of later litigation may be inconsistent with the results of the initial litigation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams, Hornsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bittle v. Cam-Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 627×
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-09-19· cited 215×
- Stamps v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1994-05-20· cited 116×
- Holland v. City of AlabasterSupreme Court of Alabama· 1990-07-06· cited 24×
- Allbritton v. DawkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-03-27· cited 14×
- Burnett v. MunozCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2002-12-13· cited 11×
- Blair v. FullmerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-06-21· cited 10×
- Laney v. GarmonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-06-05· cited 7×
- Dauphin Island v. Point PropertiesSupreme Court of Alabama· 1993-04-27· cited 6×
- Percha Creek Mining, LLC v. FustNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-06-18· cited 5×
- Wilson v. BerryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-10-16· cited 4×
- Gilmore v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2012-03-02· cited 2×
- Boles v. AuterySupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-07-26· cited 2×
- Bradley v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2017-05-05· cited 2×
- Steele v. O'NealCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-08-26· cited 1×
- Gilmore v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama· 2012-05-11
- Newman v. Skypark Properties, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2018-06-15
- Manning v. HesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-05-19
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-12-02· cited 242×
- Jefferson County v. SulzbySupreme Court of Alabama· 1985-03-29· cited 39×
- City of Montgomery v. Orpheum Taxi Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1919-02-06· cited 28×
- Johnston v. White-SpunnerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1977-02-04· cited 27×
- Thetford v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama· 1927-12-22· cited 22×
- Geer Bros., Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1982-07-07· cited 21×
- Mead Corp. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama· 1977-09-30· cited 20×
- Davis v. BurnetteSupreme Court of Alabama· 1976-12-30· cited 16×
Other cases named Boles v. Autery
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.