Bolen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unnecessary to consider propriety of charge concerning essential element of crime; no more than harmless error involved because \there was no issue or contention whatever as to the subject matter of the challenged instruction\
• unnecessary to consider propriety of charge concerning essential element of crime; no more than harmless error involved because “there was no issue or contention whatever as to the subject matter of the challenged instruction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-30· cited 55×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-18· cited 11×
• Worthey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-17· cited 6×
• Duska v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-01· cited 1×
• Lenoir v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-19· cited 1×
• Dubois v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abbott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-05-25· cited 32×
• National Car Rental System, Inc. v. Holland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-11-30· cited 28×
• Mancebo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-09-27· cited 13×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-07-03· cited 6×
• State v. Moss
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-02-09· cited 6×