Bolen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellant cannot affirmatively agree to the sufficiency of the State’s proof of his PRR qualifications at sentencing and then later invoke rule 3.800(b)(2) to take the opposite position.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• ROD L. BRUCE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-02-10

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maddox v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-11· cited 262×
• Terry v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-04· cited 247×
• Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-11-12· cited 84×
• Brannon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 72×
• Armstrong v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 64×
• State v. Lucas
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-17· cited 58×
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-25· cited 50×
• Gudinas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-13· cited 18×