Boldt v. CORPESPONDENCE MANGAEMENT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that, “[w]hile the Department [of Health] retains the jurisdictional authority to sanction those that violate the rule” at issue, plaintiffs had a private right of action to enforce a regulation where they sought “money damages, a remedy not available at the agency level”
• patients who were overcharged for copies of their medical records in violation of administrative code were \clearly in the class to be protected by the regulations\
• “If the Legislature intended to foreclose plaintiffs . . . from seeking the relief sought here, it would have explicitly limited the availability of that remedy or relief.”
• private right of action existed because regulations did not provide for an administrative remedy
• “If the Legislature intended to foreclose plaintiffs . . . from seeking the relief sought here, it would have explicitly limited the availability of that remedy or relief.” (citing Lally, 428 A.2d 1317

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).