Boldridge v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “violation of regulatory laws such as . . . drunk driving” does not involve moral turpi- tude
• recognizing that the “violation of regulatory laws such as gambling or drunk driving” does not involve moral turpitude
• explaining that since moral turpitude is a \nebulous\ concept, courts will only overturn the Board's determination that a crime fits within that rubric if the determination is unreasonable
• noting that statutory rape is a crime of moral turpitude
• noting that statutory rape is a crime of moral turpitude
• “Having consistently adhered to its view ... for nearly twenty years, the BIA’s interpretation is entitled to deference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).