Skip to main content

Bolding v. Bolding

Citations

  • 293 S.E.2d 699
  • 278 S.C. 129
  • 1982 S.C. LEXIS 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing change of custody of eleven-year-old because “Fa ther failed in his burden of establishing a change of condition sufficient to warrant a transfer of custody, as the only change alleged or proved involved the wishes of the eleven-year-old child.”
  • stating “[t]he significance to be attached to the wishes of the child in a custody dispute depends upon the age of the child and the attendant circumstances,” and discounting the importance of the preference expressed by an eleven-year-old
  • “In order to justify a change of custody, the party seeking the transfer bears the burden of establishing a material change of conditions substantially affecting the welfare of the child.”
  • “In order to justify a change of custody, the party seeking the transfer bears the burden of establishing a material change of conditions substantially affecting the welfare of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Littlejohn, Gregory, Harwell, Ness

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.