Bolden v. Summers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, in the context of removal, a dispute over the terms of an ERISA plan did not 7 “arise out of the same set of facts” as a personal injury suit and “does not depend on a finding of 8 liability” in that suit
• granting the motion to remand some of the plaintiffs claims to state court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).