Bolden v. Peake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the convening authority “can only take action that conforms to the limitations and conditions prescribed by the [lower court’s] remand”
• stating that a convening authority lacked power on remand to set aside a finding of guilt because the remanding court had not authorized the convening authority to set aside the finding
• voiding CA’s remedial action purporting to dismiss affirmed findings and affirming a sentence of no punishment following the appellant’s administrative discharge
• affirming court of criminal review’s decision vacat- ing convening authority’s ultra vires set aside of findings previously affirmed by the appellate court and rejecting the appellant’s attempt to withdraw the case from appellate review
• affirming Court of Criminal Re- view’s decision vacating convening authority’s ultra vires set aside of findings previously affirmed by the appellate court and rejecting the appellant’s at- tempt to withdraw the case from appellate review
• “If [the CAAF] remands a case to [a court of criminal appeals (CCA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).