· 7/16/2002
Bold Corp. v. County of Lancaster
Citations
- 801 A.2d 469
- 569 Pa. 107
- 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1439
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that classifications in a taxing scheme must have a rational basis
- challenge by area hotels to hotel room rental tax to pay for project
- challenge by area hotels to hotel room tax to pay for Project
- distinguishing Monzo and upholding Lancaster County's hotel room tax
- distinguishing Monzo and upholding Lancaster County’s hotel room tax
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.