Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that conflicting expert testimony is resolved in favor of the successful party on appeal
• holding that a regulation defining “toxic pollutants” was unconstitutionally vague
• stating that the objective of the WQA is to abate and prevent water pollution
• rejecting an argument that the Commission failed to comply with City of Roswell when the Commission submitted a general statement of reasons and a record similar to the record presented here
• applying rules of statutory construction to agency regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).